I was reading through my Facebook feed today and someone had posted a link to a blog post titled “No one is living the life they post on social media” and subtitled “It is merely a small piece that fits into a picture.”
Turns out that the post is mostly about the stress of parenting. I’m not a parent, but I continued reading. The overall takeaway was: People generally post only the best parts of their life to social media.*
This was not news to me, but the new thing that occurred to me at that moment was that the same is true of many layouts. I’m not just thinking Facebook (and blog posts), but the modeling press, as well.
I don’t know about you, but my favorite articles tend to be the layout spotlights. Now, there’s no question that a lot of the modeling that is showcased in these articles is top notch. It’s easy to look at the photos that accompany any given article and think to yourself, “That’s some great modeling. A perfect scene. I could never do that.” But many times, what you see on the page isn’t the whole story.
I love that Model Railroader highlights the photo locations on the accompanying track plan. (While I love Railroad Model Craftsman, they are sorely lacking there.) I will often flip back and forth many times between the pictures and the plan to get a feel for how everything goes together.
I’ve noticed this generally uncovers one of two things:
What that means to me is:
This is not universal, obviously. I’ve seen some large layouts where nearly everything was uniformly spectacular. But that’s the exception rather than the rule.
That’s because the camera is a magic box. The composition and framing of a photo allows the photographer to focus on the good parts and understate the not-so-good bits. The lead photo for this post is a good example. It’s taken from a section I built on the layout of my old club. I think it looks pretty good, although the depth of field is poor. It was taken to document progress on that section and I was satisfied with the quality of what was there. “What was there” being the operative term.
Let me show you behind the curtain and share some photos from other angles. They show that there was some creative camera placement and that there was still a lot of work to be done.
Let’s talk about what the lead photo hides:
By no means was the photo or the scene it captured ready for publication. But the photos helped me to validate the composition and to identify what needed to be improved. To the casual observer, it looked pretty good; the better-trained eye may have picked up other problems. But it was staged in such a way that there was no way to identify some of the obvious faults that existed.
The moral of the story? I think there are at least two:
* Not exclusively, of course. There are plenty of sad posts about dying relatives and such, but you get the gist.
Is this blog helpful? Informative?
Let me know in the comments. And don’t forget to subscribe!